| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Sticky:Exploit: Bumping in order to prevent E-Warp - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Dolan wrote: [We can very clearly see this in our logs. Just let us know if something like this has happened to you and our records will do all the verifying (although fraps or screen shots certainly wouldn't hurt). Are you seriously clai...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2013.11.29 11:53:00
|
2. Veto Corp Presents - EVE London - Saturday, September 28th 2013 - in Out of Game Events and Gatherings [original thread]
I'm not sure who it was but one of those CCP employees should change name to CCP Deadeye imo.
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2013.10.01 22:04:00
|
3. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Snot Shot wrote: Hi guis!! I thought I would dip my toe in here and remind everyone of one thing.......the CFC are free to log in their Supers at anytime. The fact is your FC's feel they are too incompetent to use them so they distract you with...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2012.03.18 00:18:00
|
4. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Our alphafleet scimitars are AB fit just for one random example straight off the top of my head. hth
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2012.03.14 22:16:00
|
5. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Nobody ever got skills or money back for not liking changes made to a ship they flew. Didn't happen with the supercarrier change either, before you go all BUT THEY COULD DOCK on me.
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2012.03.14 22:10:00
|
6. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
See this is why we kind of like PL even though they use a lot of supercaps and don't like Raidendot because they use a lot of supercaps. It's this post. This post right here.
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2012.03.14 21:45:00
|
7. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Gertrud ToD wrote: limiting the amount of targets titans can lock, raising the locking time... there is only one counter that supercap heavy alliances can do to that: bring more titans. the tracking nerf can easy be countered by having more RR...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2012.03.13 12:44:00
|
8. The High-sec vote is not split too much; most of High-sec just doesn't vote ... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Vladimir Vladimirovitch Putain wrote: CSM elections should be turned into isk sinks. If CSM candidates had to pay a few billions of isk to run, I'm sure you'd see less candidates but better ones and with more structured programs and ideas. The ...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2012.03.11 22:10:00
|
9. WTB: Your CSM votes - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
A whole 5 million!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2012.03.08 03:40:00
|
10. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Solar Blade CCP KNOWS what they are doing. They've been doing it for years. boot.ini (Yes it's a strawman and hyperbole but what I'm saying is that even with good intentions you can mess up and do something wrong and it ...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.10 09:46:00
|
11. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Good morning dear CCP devs, are you ready for another day of avoiding player feedback questions? Here I'll give you one to start you off with: YES OR NO: Due to the increased risk and logistics effort required, 0.0 should be more - not as - pro...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.10 09:19:00
|
12. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Sethur Blackcoat on 09/11/2009 20:53:27 Originally by: Vivian Azure Making money is no motivator to go into 0.0 for all tose empire-dwellers, as those empire-dwellers are simply not interested in PvP. You can remove all LvL ...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.09 20:53:00
|
13. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto Also, because it's not Sunday night any more, it's time to start spamming the question again: YES OR NO: Due to the increased risk and logistics effort required, 0.0 should be more - not as - profitable (i...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.09 17:05:00
|
14. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Kepakh Holy **** I'm dumb. We are comparing the best available highsec income source to the best available 0.0 income source. The highsec one is more valuable. That is the problem. Also are you seriously insinuating that...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.09 16:35:00
|
15. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Kepakh Yep, that's it. Perfect answer for stupid question of such type. Even further in the thread Chronotis(?) admits that CCP is aware of high profitability of L4. I think you don't understand what 'answer' means. Also...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.09 15:50:00
|
16. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Sethur Blackcoat on 09/11/2009 15:32:44 Originally by: Kepakh Search pages 25-60, it is burried somewhere there. Hmm, you mean http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1210267&page=25#723 this? Because th...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.09 15:32:00
|
17. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
look at that, past 3 p.m. in Iceland and still no answer, hmm YES OR NO: Due to the increased risk and logistics effort required, 0.0 should be more - not as - profitable (in raw isk/h) than highsec L4 mission running.
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.09 15:23:00
|
18. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
welp, in a few hours people are going to start trundling into the CCP offices again, let's hope when I get up then we'll finally have a decent answer to the little overlooked question of YES OR NO: Due to the increased risk and logistics effort r...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.09 04:24:00
|
19. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Dharh Be that as it may. I think that could change, and should. Personally I wish all forms of gaining ISK had built in diminishing returns (like X number of bounties to collect per 24 hours, or X rats spawn per 24 hours). T...
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.08 22:36:00
|
20. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Daemonspirit Your masterful rolleyes has slain the idea that someone might do things for a reason that has been considered for at least thousands of years one of the great sins. Why don't you work on lust, next.
- by Sethur Blackcoat - at 2009.11.08 22:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |